As we discussed when we first started analyzing Hamlet,
there is a problem of power in the sense that King Hamlet died and the throne
of Denmark should have been taken by Prince Hamlet, but instead his uncle
Claudius took the throne for himself after marrying Queen Gertrude in what
seemed to be an elaborated plan.
Now, as older societies were very respectful of their
traditions, one would have thought they would see Claudius claim of the throne
as an illegitimate one, but here’s when Claudius great mind first come to
stage. Claudius, unlike old King Hamlet, is a true politician, a diplomat. He’s
no soldier. And as the good politician he is, he is able to make his way out of
uncomfortable situations through words.
Claudius is the representative of a new order, one that
makes use of words, diplomacy or plots to achieve its goals. King Hamlet and
Hamlet himself represent an old order in which only actions matter. One of
Claudius’ first move as King is to send ambassadors to Norway to sort out the
Fortimbras’ situation, whereas King Hamlet would have sent his army or he would
have fought Fortimbras himself, as he did with King Fortimbras. Here we can see
the paradigm shift, using words instead of arms.
Examples of Claudius’ use of words are plenty, like the
speech he gives to Hamlet when trying to get him out of his mourning (I.ii.68).
Even in the final moments when he tries to kill Hamlet, he tries to make it
look like an accident so that no one can link him with Hamlet’s death. He is
aware of the impact of Hamlet’s death can have in Denmark, thus showing again
glimpses of his politician nature. His first attempt is through Guildenstern
and Rosencrantz and the letters he prepared to arrange Hamlet’s death, but
Hamlet discovers such plot and changes the letters having Guildenstern and
Rosencrantz killed. He then returns to Denmark just after Laertes has returned
from France. Once again, Claudius mind is set to work as he encourages Laertes
to take action against Hamlet to avenge the murder of his father (IV.v.98).
Whether the way in which he got to the throne is
questionable, we cannot argue his qualities as a politician and his ability to
use words at his favour.
References:
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario